Vaishakhi Lahoti


Starry Starry Night

Starry Starry Night

It was about midnight, the embers from the bonfire had almost died down. Fireflies danced around our camp to lighten up the pitch darkness. The wind rustled and I looked up to see a clear sky with a dazzling array of stars, sparkling through just like the fireflies. That’s the photographer in my head spoke -“wonder if this beauty could be captured?”
I have had some experience with shooting fireworks so I knew how this might have to be done. Groping for a torch I found my camera from the car and turned it on. The panel LCD was almost as bright as the torch and I really wondered if I had enough light to take a photo.
Lets consider the scenario. In that pitch darkness there was no way the camera was going to auto focus, I had to change the focus to manual and ramp it to infinity. The angle of the lens had to be exactly upright, so I would have either craned my neck  or lied down to hold the camera. Holding the camera in my hand was also impossible as I knew I would need at least 10 seconds of exposure to get any imprint on the sensor. So I set the shutter timer to 2 seconds, and placed the camera on its back on the bare ground (gasp gasp) and took a shot with a 10 second exposure with maximum aperture, widest focal length 24mm and ISO 800.
10 seconds later, the image came out with absolutely nothing.
Increasing the ISO to 1600 and shutter speed to 20 seconds got me to show flickers of the brightest stars but nothing like the beautiful sky above me.

Increasing the shutter to 3o seconds ( the maximum possible without getting into the BULB mode) I finally captured the stars but on closer inspection it turned out that there was a slight wind which had made my stars “move a little”.

Another try gave me better results but I captured a UFO on the screen. Any guesses what those two green lights are? Hint: there is nothing alien about these

Finally, after a few more tries, I got a good view of the sky with quite a few stars and bit of the tree line bring in contrast. I proudly showed the photo on my camera LCD to my friends who agreed that those 20 minutes of my life trying to take photos of the stars were not probably all that in vain.

But wait, these photos dont look like the photo at the top so how did I get there? With a bit of Paint shop magic of course. Back home when I opened my perfect image it looked good, but extremely boring. So I captured a bunch of dots on a grainy background. How would any one know if those were real stars or not? Those beautiful pictures of stars we see in magazines and tv shows are somehow different and sharper. Since I wasnt going back to the camp to take more pictures, I had to rely on post processing to bring those features in to my photo.
First, using Lightroom I created a few versions of my image from the RAW file. One was specifically to bring in a blue background. The other to make the stars brighter with additional contrast and a few others to become the base and masking layers.
Using Paint Shop Pro (or Photoshop) , I stacked up all the layers and started playing with the blend modes. I think I used the Brighten, Luminance, and Screen blend modes to get to a base image that showed a blue sky with bright stars in it.
Then to spruce up things, I used the stars tube brush to bring in some artificial sparkles to the brightest stars. See the difference below when you hover.

Here comes the last part of the challenge. I now have a beautiful pictures of stars that I dont know anything about. It was like looking at beautiful calligraphy of a language I did not understand. Were some of these planets? Or constellations that I knew of (Ursa Major, Orion?). How would I know if the brightest stars were part of the same constellation. Did I capture too small a portion of the sky to ever know. It hit me- this was almost impossible! Unless there was someone who knew better than me about stars I may be totally lost.
Zoom out view of the constellation

I downloaded the Skymap site  this year and looked hard at it. It was a chart of the constellations that would be seen in the northern hemisphere this month. Orion wasn’t around, Ursa Major did not match the pattern nor did Ursa Minor. I must have spent hours looking at the photo and almost giving up. I really didn’t think it would be so hard. And then I got a very lucky break. I found a small constellation, a curve of stars looking just like something I had on the photo. And lo and behold, suddenly all the stars started to match up. It was truly incredible, just like connecting the dots when we were kids except this was unbelievably precise. Once I had figured out one constellation all I had to do was map the different stars. Turns out there were four constellations that I had captured and only two of them were captured in the whole. I was very very lucky. If I had set my camera even a degree in a different angle I might not have captured even one constellation in the whole. For all you stargazers, the constellations you can make out on the photo are Bootes and the beautiful Corona Borealis.
This was undoubtedly the most time I had spent in figuring out a photo even after I was done with post processing. It was also the most rewarding. Do have a look at the star mapped versions Standard and Full size (6.5MB) of the photo here.
And do let me know if you liked it 🙂

Hungry anybody?

Hungry anybody?

Food photography is one of those realms that I feel I am still so behind the curve. Its not so much lack of technique that hinders me, more so of lack of the right settings and of course the food.
Blame it on the craze for the show “Chopped“, in the past few years my quotient for beautiful food has increased a lot. I have always been the kind of person who did not care how the food looked as long it was edible and generally tasty. That may also give you an idea of how bad of a cook I am! Hubby on the other hand is a great cook (good for me) and as I grew as a photographer I grew the appetite for good food photos.
Most photos of food in magazines are very well choreographed. Let me explain, not only is the food plated impeccably, garnished colorfully but there are color coordinated shiny cutlery and some candles, and wine.  In contrast, after cooking a good meal at home, its generally left on the vessel it got cooked to cool. The cutlery if not the disposable stuff would be worn out. No pretty napkins here.
Lighting is also an issue, kitchens dont have very pretty lighting so a separate specialized lighting is almost necessary. You can get away with a diffused sunlight through a window in the day. Currently, I use my flash to bounce light into the food and try to get that “professional food”. That being said, I have to learn a lot of tricks for this kind of photography.
Most food photos are tack sharp, something that can only be achieved through really good glass and also from a very close range which would need some macro capability. For a long time the only lens I could use for this purpose was the 50mm F1.8. The problem with it was that it got very soft at the larger apertures and it had a minimum focus distance of 1.5 feet meant I couldnt get very close either. Ever since the 60mm F2.8 macro lens arrived, I’ve been on the moon. It can focus at 3.5 inches! And its so sharp that you could cut your fingers just looking at the photos (poor joke I know).
The following collection of photos are mostly with that fabulous lens and some from my old experiments. Do let me know if you like them, and more so if you dont because that is the only way I learn.
I found a cheap little soft box on amazon, hopefully with that in my arsenal I could kick up a few notches on my food photography. It will be fun though to see my dear hubby’s expression when he sweats out a super duper dish after hours in the heat and then I arrive with the softbox in one hand and camera in other, to ultimately claim accolades for the photos of his work!